Bankruptcy Misconduct - Downloads

Home

Downloads Home

Search document

Downloads

Downloads Home » Pleadings

DocumentsDate added

Order by : name | date | hits [ ascendent ]

Worldcom : Objection to ACPOC Motion Exhibits

13.11.2007

The exhibits to the Objection of the ACPOC motion include some awesome documents. First, it includes at exhibit C the transcript of the discussion between the bankruptcy lawyer and his client wherein the lawyer advises that it is legal to threaten to kill someone. Secondly, a long series of letters between the client's lawyer and a number of lawyers working for WorldCom. Specifically, Weil Gotshal & Manges received numerous letters where the creditors lawyer urged that attention be focused on threats by lawyers for Worldcom against the creditor, and on the arbitrary releases being sought which were not authorized by the confirmed plan of reorganization but would have had the affect of releasing WorldCom from all claims derivative of extortion, racketeering, and bankruptcy fraud.

Worldcom : Objection to ACPOC motion by counsel w/ "death threat"

11.09.2007

In the largest ever bankruptcy case - Worldcom - the bankruptcy attorney who was then currently representing one of the largest unaffiliated (unconflicted) claims traders (Next Factors, Inc.) petitioned the Court to be relieved from continuing as Next's counsel. The lawyer admits that his reason for seeking permission to withdraw was that he did not want to follow the instructions of his client in seeking to have all potential conflicts between the multi-hundred million dollar fee earning lawyers and their hedge fund clients exposed. You can't make this stuff up: The lawyer tried to shake his client off by conveying a death threat during a conversation with the president of Next Factors. A transcript of the conversation was attached to this filing and the attorney did not merely tacitly acknowledge that the transcript was accurate, he complained that "apparantly" the conversation was recorded without his knowledge. This is better than a TV show. People ask me: "but, umm, like wouldn't the government do something?" Yes, each and every DOJ official, Judge, and officer of the court which learned of the exchange and underlying facts would have done something, provided that they remained true to their oaths to uphold the law, follow professional ethics codes, and defend the Constitution. Sadly it appears that too many public officials connected to the multi-billion dollar bankruptcy industry hold their allegiances to their own families, bank accounts, racial agendas, and organized crime affiliates above all else.

Homepage: http://www.weil.com/marciagoldstein/

U.S. Trustee's peculiar responce in re: eToys

03.04.2008

It has been alleged that certain government lawyers operating as official U.S. Trustees including Stapleton, DeAngelis, Kenney and Vara, all committed Perjury in the Third Circuit appeal, as they defended the right to give implied, blanket, immunity to the felony acts, by stating, Falsely, in their opposition that the appeal had no merits. (3rd Cir 07-2360). Voluminous postings on the internet further allege 1) that some of the government lawyers involved in the eToys scandal were formerly associated with some of the Biglaw law firms which Haas "the whistle-blower" accused of fraud upon the court when failing to disclose conflict of interest, and 2) that some of the government lawyers alleged to have failed to take approriate initial action were later sitting in administrative positions having authority to evaluate subsequent complaints as to their own prior conduct, and further did not recuse themselves or make public this self-policing conflict.

Supreme Court of New NY - eToys Suit against Goldman Sachs

27.02.2008

eToys is not a destination. eToys is a process, the tip of the spear in a revolution by government attorneys and members of the Federal Judiciary against the corruption within which dared to attempt to taint the honor of scores of honest and just public servants, and which abused the freedom won for all U.S. Citizens by the sacrifices of our Veterans.

Homepage: http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/May/236ag.htm

SEC - so simple even a Caveman can see it!

02.04.2008

The SEC states clearly what their mission is. We should believe that the SEC will not provide any special treatment to any hedge fund, no matter which former DOJ attorneys such hedge fund is employing. If Martha Stewart goes to prison, one can only imagine what will happen to the colluding parties on this one. Word to Linda: You lookin' so fine baby ... You clean up real nice!

Homepage: http://www.bankruptcymisconduct.com/site/content/view/42/67/