Bankruptcy Misconduct - Downloads

Home

Documents

Downloads Home

Search document

Downloads

Downloads Home » Bar Filings

DocumentsDate added

Order by : name | date | hits | [ ascendent ]

CA Bar Revised Complainthot!

13.05.2007

Revised ethics complaint to the California State Bar ("CA Bar") alleging a series of disclosure failures and extreme misconduct by Hennigan, Bennett, & Dorman ("HBD") with respect to their appointment as counsel to the Debtor In Possession Aureal, Inc. vis a vis a number of HBD's simultaneous clients which were adverse to Aureal including hedge fund Oaktree Capital et al., Argo Partners, and PriceWaterhouseCoopers. The Revised Complaint was supplemented by additional documents requested by the CA Bar and was thereby expanded to include ethical violations related to and intertwined with SEC Violations. These additional documents are available on this site under the title: SEC filings by client of PriceWaterhouseCoopers and HBD.

CA Bar Complaint

18.07.2008

CA Bar complaint against the Hennigan, Bennett, & Dorman ("HBD") law firm in connection with their official appointment as counsel to the Debtor In Possession in the Aureal, Inc. bankruptcy proceedings in the Northern District of California. The complaint points out that the law firm failed to make a timely and complete disclosure of all facts and relevant circumstances related to their concurrent representation of their conflicted hedge fund client Oaktree Capital et. al which was indisputably adverse to Aureal as the sole secured creditor and largest stockholder of the Debtor. Thus, every official act performed by HBD in the Aureal proceedings that involved their conflicted client Oaktree was an unwaivable conflicted prohibited by Federal law and in further violated numerous provisions of the California Rules of Professional Conduct (ethics laws), including without limitation CRPC 3-310. False statements and intentionally withheld information in a bankruptcy case constitutes bankruptcy fraud, unless there exists special immunity for acts committed by former DOJ employees or by lawfirms with former partners currently employed within the DOJ.

CABAURHBD Chart 1

01.05.2007

Color coded chart showing the chronology of certain instances of Attorney Misconduct with hyperlinks within the Revised Complaint

CABAURHBD Chart 3

01.05.2007

Color coded chart showing the chronology of Conflicted Representation with hyperlinks into the Revised Complaint. This chart is Exhibit X of the Revised Complaint.

CABAURHBD Chart 2

01.05.2007

Color coded chart showing the chronology of Conflicted Representation with hyperlinks into the Revised Complaint. This chart is Exhibit J of the Revised Complaint.