Bankruptcy Misconduct - Downloads

Home

Downloads Home

Search document

Downloads

Downloads Home » Pleadings

DocumentsDate added

Order by : name | date | hits | [ ascendent ]

Criminal Referral

31.12.2007

This sworn letter to the U.S. Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey clearly identifies and describes criminal conduct by a certain "bankruptcy ring" as well as the willful failure to perform duty by certain U.S. Attorneys. Most alarmingly, it appears that no federal officer came forth to identify and disarm the conflict of interest caused by allowing the federal attorney holding administrative control over the investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators to be none other than a member of the very same law firm when the crimes were commited.

Affidavit re: Opposition to ACPOC Motion by HG&K to benefit MNAT

31.01.2008

The law firm, Heiman Gouge & Kaufman, LLP ("Heiman") which was representing the whistle-blower in the eToys bankruptcy case needed the court's approval to stop representing the whistleblower and thus filed a motion to be relieved. This behavior is known as an ACPOC Syndrome Motion whereby a lawfirm seeks to abandon its client in order to avoid taking action which could bring punishment on an opposing attorney. The whistleblower filed this affidavit showing relevant facts unreported by Heiman in their motion, as well as an extraordinary letter from a different honorable lawer who would not let Heiman dance around its responsibility.

Worldcom : Objection to ACPOC Motion Exhibits

13.11.2007

The exhibits to the Objection of the ACPOC motion include some awesome documents. First, it includes at exhibit C the transcript of the discussion between the bankruptcy lawyer and his client wherein the lawyer advises that it is legal to threaten to kill someone. Secondly, a long series of letters between the client's lawyer and a number of lawyers working for WorldCom. Specifically, Weil Gotshal & Manges received numerous letters where the creditors lawyer urged that attention be focused on threats by lawyers for Worldcom against the creditor, and on the arbitrary releases being sought which were not authorized by the confirmed plan of reorganization but would have had the affect of releasing WorldCom from all claims derivative of extortion, racketeering, and bankruptcy fraud.