Bankruptcy Misconduct - Downloads

Home

Downloads Home

Search document

Downloads

Downloads Home » Pleadings

DocumentsDate added

Order by : name | date | hits | [ descendent ]

Worldcom : Objection to ACPOC Motion Exhibits

13.11.2007

The exhibits to the Objection of the ACPOC motion include some awesome documents. First, it includes at exhibit C the transcript of the discussion between the bankruptcy lawyer and his client wherein the lawyer advises that it is legal to threaten to kill someone. Secondly, a long series of letters between the client's lawyer and a number of lawyers working for WorldCom. Specifically, Weil Gotshal & Manges received numerous letters where the creditors lawyer urged that attention be focused on threats by lawyers for Worldcom against the creditor, and on the arbitrary releases being sought which were not authorized by the confirmed plan of reorganization but would have had the affect of releasing WorldCom from all claims derivative of extortion, racketeering, and bankruptcy fraud.

Affidavit re: Opposition to ACPOC Motion by HG&K to benefit MNAT

31.01.2008

The law firm, Heiman Gouge & Kaufman, LLP ("Heiman") which was representing the whistle-blower in the eToys bankruptcy case needed the court's approval to stop representing the whistleblower and thus filed a motion to be relieved. This behavior is known as an ACPOC Syndrome Motion whereby a lawfirm seeks to abandon its client in order to avoid taking action which could bring punishment on an opposing attorney. The whistleblower filed this affidavit showing relevant facts unreported by Heiman in their motion, as well as an extraordinary letter from a different honorable lawer who would not let Heiman dance around its responsibility.

Supreme Court of New NY - eToys Suit against Goldman Sachs

27.02.2008

eToys is not a destination. eToys is a process, the tip of the spear in a revolution by government attorneys and members of the Federal Judiciary against the corruption within which dared to attempt to taint the honor of scores of honest and just public servants, and which abused the freedom won for all U.S. Citizens by the sacrifices of our Veterans.

Homepage: http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/May/236ag.htm

U.S. Trustee's peculiar responce in re: eToys

03.04.2008

It has been alleged that certain government lawyers operating as official U.S. Trustees including Stapleton, DeAngelis, Kenney and Vara, all committed Perjury in the Third Circuit appeal, as they defended the right to give implied, blanket, immunity to the felony acts, by stating, Falsely, in their opposition that the appeal had no merits. (3rd Cir 07-2360). Voluminous postings on the internet further allege 1) that some of the government lawyers involved in the eToys scandal were formerly associated with some of the Biglaw law firms which Haas "the whistle-blower" accused of fraud upon the court when failing to disclose conflict of interest, and 2) that some of the government lawyers alleged to have failed to take approriate initial action were later sitting in administrative positions having authority to evaluate subsequent complaints as to their own prior conduct, and further did not recuse themselves or make public this self-policing conflict.

Criminal Referral

31.12.2007

This sworn letter to the U.S. Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey clearly identifies and describes criminal conduct by a certain "bankruptcy ring" as well as the willful failure to perform duty by certain U.S. Attorneys. Most alarmingly, it appears that no federal officer came forth to identify and disarm the conflict of interest caused by allowing the federal attorney holding administrative control over the investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators to be none other than a member of the very same law firm when the crimes were commited.