
|
Home
Downloads
DocumentsDate added
-
U.S. Trustee's peculiar responce in re: eToys
-
03.04.2008
-
It has been alleged that certain government lawyers operating as official U.S. Trustees including Stapleton, DeAngelis, Kenney and Vara, all committed Perjury in the
Third Circuit appeal, as they defended the right to give implied,
blanket, immunity to the felony acts, by stating, Falsely, in their opposition that the appeal had no merits. (3rd Cir 07-2360). Voluminous postings on the internet further allege 1) that some of the government lawyers involved in the eToys scandal were formerly associated with some of the Biglaw law firms which Haas "the whistle-blower" accused of fraud upon the court when failing to disclose conflict of interest, and 2) that some of the government lawyers alleged to have failed to take approriate initial action were later sitting in administrative positions having authority to evaluate subsequent complaints as to their own prior conduct, and further did not recuse themselves or make public this self-policing conflict.
-
Hits: 46
-
-
Worldcom : Objection to ACPOC motion by counsel w/ "death threat"
-
11.09.2007
-
In the largest ever bankruptcy case - Worldcom - the bankruptcy attorney who was then currently representing one of the largest unaffiliated (unconflicted)
claims traders (Next Factors, Inc.) petitioned the Court to be relieved
from continuing as Next's counsel. The lawyer admits that his reason
for seeking permission to withdraw was that he did not want to follow the instructions of his client in
seeking to have all potential conflicts between the multi-hundred
million dollar fee earning lawyers and their hedge fund clients exposed. You can't make this stuff up: The lawyer tried to shake his client off by conveying a death threat during a conversation with the president of Next Factors. A
transcript of the conversation was attached to this filing and the
attorney did not merely tacitly acknowledge that the transcript was
accurate, he complained that "apparantly" the conversation was recorded
without his knowledge. This is better than a TV show. People ask me: "but, umm, like wouldn't the government do something?" Yes,
each and every DOJ official, Judge, and officer of the court which
learned of the exchange and underlying facts would have done something,
provided that they remained true to their oaths to uphold the law,
follow professional ethics codes, and defend the Constitution. Sadly
it appears that too many public officials connected to the
multi-billion dollar bankruptcy industry hold their
allegiances to their own families, bank accounts, racial agendas, and
organized crime affiliates above all else.
-
Homepage: http://www.weil.com/marciagoldstein/
-
Hits: 80
-
-
Worldcom : Objection to ACPOC Motion Exhibits
-
13.11.2007
-
The exhibits to the Objection of the ACPOC motion include some awesome documents. First, it includes at exhibit C the transcript of the discussion between the bankruptcy lawyer and his client wherein the lawyer advises that it is legal to threaten to kill someone. Secondly, a long series of letters between the client's lawyer and a number of lawyers working for WorldCom. Specifically, Weil Gotshal & Manges received numerous letters where the creditors lawyer urged that attention be focused on threats by lawyers for Worldcom against the creditor, and on the arbitrary releases being sought which were not authorized by the confirmed plan of reorganization but would have had the affect of releasing WorldCom from all claims derivative of extortion, racketeering, and bankruptcy fraud.
-
Hits: 11
-
|
Latest Comments
|
|

|
|
|