|
Home
Document details
Details for Attorney Transcript - "I see you, I'm going to kill you."
| Property | Value |
| Name | Attorney Transcript - "I see you, I'm going to kill you." |
| Description | A Bankruptcy Attorney states to a creditor in the Worldcom bankruptcy : "I see you, I'm going to kill you."
Taken in the full context of the transcript (which was affirmed by the
quoted attorney in Federal court as being accurate before Judge ARTHUR J. GONZALEZ)
the statement is shocking. At best, this lawyer is advising to his
client the legality of issuing death threats as well as his casual
acceptance as to the use of this sort of extortion by a bankruptcy
professional against a creditor in the ordinary course of a corporate
bankruptcy. Perhaps more accurately we witness the lawyer conveying a
threat to his client, either a thinly veiled warning that other parties
threaten to kill the client, or the lawyer is intending to threaten the
client on his own behalf.
Either way, there is no possible dispute of the fact that this
lawyer brought up the subject of death threats during an increasingly
heated discussion in which this lawyer revealed he didn't want the
issue of conflicted relationships and favoritism to certain hedge fund
/ vulture investment firms to be made public. In a Fabulous Flip Flop Fantastique,
this lawyer forbade his own associate attorney (his employee) from
filing the very same document which his employee drafted for the client
at the client's expense. In other words, the client did not prepare a
document and tell this lawyer "Put your name on what I wrote and file it". This Lawyer's own associate prepared the document! Why such a 180 degree change of heart?
A
simple request that the Court orders a party to disclose information is
extremely common in bankruptcy cases. What isn't common is that the nations most powerful billion dollar BigLaw firms and their hedge fund clients are the target of the request.
Why bring up "death threats"? What lawyer in his right mind
interjects the subject of death and murder - in the context of
extortion - when giving legal advice to a client? Any preliminary investigation
would first have to determin if there were any undisclosed conflicts or
favoritism in the distributions to the small circle of claims traders
holding some $600 Million dollars worth of claims. Such an
investigation would be extremely easy given that a special prosecutor
could start with a form letter to the few dozen law firms involved, and
the 50 claims traders. Also, Worldcom's complete distributions are
maintained on a computer and each payment amount and date is easily
compared to the amounts and dates of payments to other creditors who
have never otherwise paid these lawyers any money. And while the
special prosecutor is investigating, maybe he can figure out why Eliot Spitzer refused to allow New York State to perform any criminal or ethical action against any of the New York lawyers involved.
Here is an important point of information and possible explanation
for this particular situation: a few special BigLaw firms which make hundreds of millions of dollars from estate fees (such as the fees in the Worldcom bankruptcy)
as they sought advantage for certain hedge funds, are powerful and
could destroy any small law firm which dared to question the facts of
undisclosed conflicts and violations of bankruptcy law. 300 pound
gorillas follow their own set of ethics rules and are otherwise above
the law when their organized crime affiliates infiltrate the DOJ and
the Judiciary. This is the reality of ACPOC Syndrome and the fact
that a small law firm could get detroyed by merely exposing misconduct
of more powerful firms. Was a Doug a coward, or a pragmatist?.
|
| Filename | Link: http://jaactv.com/330/site/dmdocuments/DougTranscript.pdf |
| Filesize | Link |
| Filetype | lnk (Mime Type: link) |
| Creator | webmaster |
| Created On: |
25.06.2008 00:00 |
| Viewers | Everybody |
| Maintained by | |
| Hits | 171 Hits |
| Last updated on |
18.07.2008 23:44 |
| Homepage | |
-
|
Latest Comments
|
|
|
|
|
Bingham McCutchen associates sequentially victimized by Date Rape Drug
