Array
(
[0] => Login failed.
[1] => Login failed.
[2] => Login failed.
[3] => Too many login failures
)
|
Hot Item!
This just in.....
This federal judge was referring to the congressionally mandated role of the U.S. Department Of Justice (DOJ) to insure the honest conduct of parties in bankruptcy proceedings, including the actions of bankruptcy professionals.
We have received preliminary reports that a federal judge found that the conduct of certain attorneys employed by the Department Of Justice aided fraud.
We have not determined whether the attorneys who assisted the fraudulent activity were private practise lawyers hired by the Department Of Justice, some sort of junior or probationary employees within the DOJ, or fully empowered DOJ attorneys. We are trying to determine the identities of the parties involved, and the criminal and employment consequences to these individuals. Unfortunately, DOJ compliance with the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) appears short of the good faith efforts Congress intended.
If you have information regarding:
criminal referrals related to the fraud
resulting criminal proceedings related to the fraud
official DOJ plan and response related to the reexamination of all other matters including investigations, prosecutions, and declined prosecutions which were handled or supervised by the same DOJ Attorneys who were found by the Court to have aided fraud in the "Asbestos Ring" matters.
Please forward information to bankruptcyMisconduct.com ASAP so that our initial coverage can be as complete as possible. We will make our best efforts to maintain the confidentiality of informants as allowed by law. We continue to accept anonymous eMails.
.........Developing ......
Write Comment (0 Comments) |
|
What's truth but a liar's gold?
Hidden, buried
Fortunes untold
-- opening lines to Strength by Ben Barone
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The ability of criminal elements to confuse the public and obfuscate the truth is fast passing like troubled waters beneath a bridge. The dishonorable avoidance of a just review of facts to a dispute, via attacking the integrity, character, and person of the whistleblower, is one of the oldest tricks in the book. So old that this form of attack was renamed "ad hominem" in Latin. Though no doubt at the time of the Latin naming, such evil was being told in even older tongues. The inevitable trouble for the unjustly enriched wrongdoers is that at some point, enough people come to know the truth.
There exists a "critical mass" of people such that once they know the truth about fraud upon the public, it is inevitable that widespread public awareness and reaction will follow. There are only so many fingers on an evil person, yet there are an uncountable number of people who live and provide for themselves not by deception and treachery, but through honor and honorable works.
How is it, How could it be, that a man with no hen in the fight can clearly discern a simple truth? A simple truth unravels a web of lies, and is the foundation upon which any honorable review of facts must stand.
Write Comment (0 Comments) |
|
Read more...
|
|
mp3 files have radically changed the music business. All should learn something about history of this change - those who don't learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.
File sharing on the internet was a central part of the rise of mp3 and decline of the consolidated control of music production and distribution. One of the earliest better known software programs which enabled peer to peer file sharing on the internet was called Napster. The RIAA sued Napster and successfully caused its demise.
Another program which enabled file sharing emerged called Aimster, which was developed by an internet expert by the name of John Deep. Aimster was similarly subjected to significant litigation. The significance of litigation which emerged around Aimster has not yet received the attention of the media. Peculiar and troubling facts are alleged about the legal representation by David Boies on behalf John Deep as a debtor in a bankruptcy filing. However, BankruptcyMisconduct predicts that eventually Mr. Deep's case will receive significant attention.
When is Legal Representation a Fraud or a Farce?
In the legal industry, "right" and "wrong" does not matter. What matters is "how much money do you have" and "how much can we harm your opponent in terms of cost and delay". Many business disputes are resolved by litigation which does not run its course, or where the lawyer for one side had a conflict of interest with their opponenet and thus held a financial bias against their own client. The result is truth and justice is cast aside for the benefit of the most aggressive payors of legal fees. Thus the U.S.A. has become a peculiar blend of opportunity for productive members of society, as well as for organized crime elements which have members in the legal industry.
How can a software developer be liable for usage by third parties?
BankruptcyMisconduct.com does not believe that a final legal resolution of the claim that the creator of a software program is responsible for every potential use of the program has ever been settled by the courts. Such finding would run counter to the precedent involving the manufacturers of videotape recorders and audio tapes. Alos consider: Why wouldn't Microsoft be responsible for producing OS sofware which allowed files to be shared, and for a MediaPlayer which allowed pirated mp3 files to be played? Why wouldn't the lawyer for an underdog defendant of file sharing software file a cross-complaint against Microsoft so that potential liability is shared? Such tactics were routinely utilized by lawyers in the CERCLA segment of the legal industry. As relevant as these questions might be, it doesn't matter as to the significance of some simple legal issues with Boies, the RIAA, and the John Deep litigation.
A Deep Conflict for Boies?
John Deep's current allegations are startling.
BankruptcyMisconduct unfortunately admits that public servants often protect people of their own kind; rare is the government attorney or judge who allows a brother to be punished. However, a simple instance of filling a false affadavit of disinterestedness in a bankruptcy case is sufficient to
put a lawyer in prison, and
it has been done.
We need more information regarding the Deep litigation. If anyone has information regarding the public record filings in any bankruptcy case of Mr. John Deep, in particular sworn affadavits and fee requests by his counsel, we would appreciate a copy at bankruptcyMisconduct.com. We will try to post news related to Mr. Deep below, perhaps with highlighted excerpts from his web site.
____________________________
____________________________
Write Comment (0 Comments) |
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>
|
| Results 25 - 32 of 45 |
Blog
PittLaw: Look At New Federal Judicial Misconduct Rules
